top of page

American Coup: The Second Civil War (Issue #038)

We are one year from the 2020 election in the United States. Despite the controlled-media’s best efforts to pretend otherwise, there is no candidate who can beat Trump in a fair election. To the permanent bureaucracy, this is unacceptable. Trump is uncontrolled, answerable only to himself and the electorate. Without control (or at least influence) over the executive branch, the globalist-types in the intelligence agencies have found it difficult to launch full scale invasions of Syria and Iran, for instance (despite staging numerous chemical, drone, and missile attacks.) How are war-mongers supposed to profit if the President doesn’t start the wars that the CIA has spent decades planning?

Hence the ongoing impeachment spectacle, which was rolled out to the public shortly after President Trump announced he had no interest in continuing the endless wars in the Middle-East [See issue #037 for more on the underhanded origins of the impeachment ‘inquiry’ – OSI:DI.]

The way in which this ‘impeachment’ is being handled bears no resemblance to the grave, last-resort check on power that the Founding Fathers intended. Rather, we are witnessing a coup attempt against a legitimately elected President orchestrated by individuals in our very own intelligence community. The plotters understand the high stakes of these actions and are attempting to clothe the coup in a thin legal veneer in order to mitigate the risk of a violent uprising from the public. OSI:DI would like to take the opportunity to outline some of the salient events in the impeachment saga:

  • Before Inauguration day, Chuck Schumer relayed an explicit threat to Trump on live television, saying that the intelligence agencies had “Six ways from Sunday at getting back at you” (Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you' – Washington Examiner, January 3, 2017)

  • Various politicians have explicitly and implicitly admitted that the goal was impeachment even before the pretext was known, the most famous example being Representative Al Green (Rep. Al Green: "I'm Concerned If We Don't Impeach This President, He Will Get Re-Elected" – Real Clear Politics, May 6, 2019)

  • The requirement for first-hand knowledge of an event when becoming a whistleblower was rescinded in immediately prior to the whistleblower claiming to have second-hand knowledge of the President’s phone call with the Ukrainian Prime Minister (Fact Check: ‘Rules’ May Not Have Changed, But Whistleblower Form Did – Breitbart, October 3, 2019)

  • House intelligence chairman Adam Schiff “advised” the whistleblower and read a fabricated version of the transcript of the call between the President and the Ukrainian President on the floor of the house. Schiff was apparently surprised by the fact that the Trump Administration released the transcript so quickly [Transcript is available here – OSI:DI]

  • Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi created a new avenue of action for the Democrats in the house by making an arcane policy change allowing for ‘impeachment inquiries.’ This impeachment inquiry has the advantage of still being marketable as an ‘impeachment’ for propaganda purposes, while not having the pesky drawbacks of actual impeachment (such as allowing Republican participation and forcing Democrats to go on record with a vote “for-or-against”)

  • Mark Zaid, the attorney for CIA ‘whistleblower’ Eric Ciamarella, tweeted the following in January 2017:

… So for those who were still skeptical, and for those who think the use of the word “coup” is hyperbole, you now have your proof. The deep-state quest to remove Donald Trump from office is real and it began well before inauguration day. The fact that this Ukrainian-quid-pro-quo narrative is the best that CIA/Establishment/Media Complex could come up with reflects very positively on President Trump. Think about it: if the deep-state has been spying on Trump since his campaign in 2015, and four years later they still have to resort to fabricating evidence of illegal activity, the President must be conducting himself with more integrity than any politician in recent memory.

By contrast, if the CIA had wanted to remove a Bush, a Clinton, or an Obama, they would have had ample damning evidence of many illegal activities. But of course, Bush, Clinton, and Obama were compliant figureheads; script-readers for the shadow government run out of Langley, New York, Geneva, London, and Tel-Aviv. And as mere ‘mascots’ for the Global International Elite, they never threatened the status quo.

But because Trump threatens the gravy-train, the endless expansionistic wars, and the drive toward a one-world-government, he must be removed; never mind what laws, evidence, and morals stand in the way! Thus, after a prolonged “Russia” investigation that yielded nothing (except two years of “bombshell” and “this is the end for Trump” headlines) we now have the Ukraine investigation.

The initial claim that Trump threatened to withhold foreign aid to the government of Ukraine unless they opened an investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden was immediately disproven by the President of the Ukraine and the transcript of the call itself. However, the controlled media is placing more emphasis on the second-hand reports of CIA officer Eric Ciamarella and his coup-plotting lawyer than they are placing on the first-hand evidence provided by transcript. The audacity of the false narrative accompanying this psychological operation against the American public is shocking. Even more shocking is the number of people who will buy into this narrative.

OSI:DI will take this opportunity to illustrate the insidiousness of psychological operations. President Trump has made a habit of withholding aid to foreign countries in order to extract concessions or policy changes, a tactic which his predecessors did not often use. Former Vice President Joe Biden is on tape admitting that he pressured the Ukrainian government (by withholding foreign aid!) into firing a prosecutor that was targeting Burisma Holdings (a company that was paying Hunter Biden $89,000 a month) [Video Link – OSI:DI.] Trump simply asked the Ukrainian President to investigate the Biden matter and see what corruption existed, without mentioning the foreign aid at all.

None of Trump’s actions were illegal. Conversely, Joe Biden’s actions were illegal. Joe Biden directly admitted that he engaged in a quid-pro-quo with Ukraine, the motive most certainly being to protect his son who was receiving bribes. These bribes were most certainly to ensure Joe Biden would lobby the Obama administration on the Ukraine’s behalf. It is not a stretch to call this treason. Donald Trump asks the Ukrainian President to provide information on this illegal activity, and is now being impeached for not committing the actions that Biden committed and acknowledged committing.

To the logical individual, this defies comprehension. What if Biden had committed murder in the Ukraine? Would Trump still be impeached if he asked the Ukraine to investigate that? Or would that still be considered “seeking a quid-pro-quo for dirt on a political opponent?” Doesn’t the President of the United States have a duty to ensure we aren’t giving foreign aid to countries that are bribing our own politicians? Looked at objectively, President Trump is doing a great public service by ensuring that an unscrupulous political prostitute like Joe Biden is kept as far from office as possible.

However, intelligence agencies understand something that a typical, rational person has difficulty accepting: the facts don’t matter. Perception is reality, and every psychological operation group on Earth understands this. This is why 85% of the Soviet KGB’s budget was spent not on high-tech gadgets or on training operatives, but on information warfare. It is why the CIA funded Operation Mockingbird [See Issue #005 for more on Operation Mockingbird – OSI:DI] And it is why the CIA/Media Complex will continue to push the impeachment narrative despite the mountain of first-hand evidence pointing to Biden’s guilt and the first-hand evidence indicating that President Trump broke no law.

The usual suspects in the Mockingbird Media know that in a few month’s time this 24/7 impeachment narrative bombardment will bring the public to the point where no one can quite remember its origins (much like the Russia investigation!) And if they simply ignore Joe Biden’s criminality and the transcript of the Trump-Ukraine phone call itself, the public will forget about those inconvenient “facts” thanks to a well-known psychological phenomenon (recency bias.) And maybe, just maybe, if the deep-state continues to demonize Trump enough by calling him racist, sexist, islamophobic, transphobic, reckless, unpresidential, dangerous, weak, and incompetent, they just might be able to execute the coup against him without triggering a “hot” civil war. And that, dear readers, is what this impeachment charade is really about.

All the flimsy legal pretext, all the twisted media coverage, all the leaked testimonies of ‘witnesses’ who didn’t actually witness the call in question – it is simply an elaborate act of theater, aimed at minimizing the chances that a well-armed militia made up of patriotic Americans who believe that the “Tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants” will take matters into their own hands. Unfortunately for the coup plotters, the psychological tactics used against the American public are transparent and ineffective against well-informed patriots! Good luck over the next year until election day 2020, and may God bless and protect the United States of America.

Related Posts

See All
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page